Browsing Posts in State Issues

To All it Should Concern;

As an American, an Illinois Resident, a Constitutional Conservative Republican and as a father of six children, I am writing out of concern for our educational institutions and their ability to remain significant. My children will be attending schools within Illinois as my wife and I had. The absolute bias against our First Amendment rights when a institution cowers to either avoid the appearance of exclusion or to further the broad agenda of those that use the Constitution when it is convenient for them, yet ignore its presence when it provides them no benefit is appalling.

The University of Illinois should open their fragile eyes to view the entire spectrum of what is happening in America. It is a reawakening of values and of our Constitution. As a proud American, I am grateful to see steadfast and honorable companies being rewarded. The University of Illinois does not need to look far or wide to notice the direction and the flow of American money. Without which, the University of Illinois shall struggle.
Companies such as Ford Motor Company, profitable because Americans realize that which deserves to be saved.

I am writing my Congressmen, Congresswoman and Senators to ask for State & Federal Funding to be halted to the University. The violation of the First Amendment is cause enough.

I ask you, whilst knowing the answer. Would the University of Illinois fire a Muslim teacher for teaching the Koran in an elective class? The Bible in the toilet would be considered art, yet the Koran in the toilet falls into a hate crime?

Kristopher P.
Homer Glen, IL

Friends-

For a few months now, I’ve been sending you e-mails about the Put-Back Amendment, a citizen-initiated amendment to provide term limits and comprehensive reform of the General Assembly. I encourage you to keep sending in signed petitions to help me get the 500,000 signatures to get this on the ballot. However, that is not the reason for my e-mail today.

Yesterday, the state Senate passed a constitutional amendment and sent it over to the House for consideration concerning redistricting. The bill is SJRCA121 and dubbed “the Citizens First Amendment”. The Senate Democrats say this amendment provides redistricting reform. You can read the text of the amendment here:
http://is.gd/buanf

Like voters across the political spectrum, I am concerned about redistricting and how it is done today. I didn’t think it could be made worse. It has. SJRCA121 represents not only maintaining the status quo, but it further consolidates power among leadership and removes the few protections citizens have now.

First, “Citizen’s First” removes contiguity as a requirement for legislative districts. What this means is that districts no longer have to be continuous, or in “one piece” as far as state law is concerned. At least now, gerrymandered districts have to be in one piece… without contiguity as a requirement, gerrymandering could be far worse. For instance, a majority party could draw a district that contains only the residences of the other party in a district that is 90% in favor of the majority party and simply draw the other party out of existence entirely.

I did a quick review of the state constitutions of the 50 states. Illinois would be the ONLY state not to require contiguity. In fact, nowhere in the Western world are districts drawn that are non-contiguous. Even South American banana republics draw their legislative districts contiguously.

Surely, someone could file suit to challenge redistricting like this you say? “Citizens First” however, limits who can file suit to challenge redistricting. In fact, only one person would be allowed under the state constitution to sue if the maps broke state law… the Attorney General. Do any of you think Lisa Madigan will sue dear old dad over redistricting? Me either. Illinois would be the ONLY state in the entire country that only allows the Attorney General to sue to protect the rights of citizens under redistricting. Here is the text from Citizens First that accomplishes this:

“(h) The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over actions concerning redistricting the House and Senate, which shall be initiated in the name of the People of the State by the Attorney General.”

Lastly, “Citizens First” allows a simply majority of a chamber to draw their own map without any input from the other party, citizens or another branch of government. We would be the only state in the union that allows the majority party unfettered ability to draw maps without any input from anyone else.

Friends, make no mistake, this amendment which passed on a party-line vote in the Senate represents a worst-case scenario for reasonable redistricting reform. Under the guise of reform, it shamelessly grabs more power and removes the few protections that are present today.

It is not too late to stop this amendment. Please call your state representative and tell them to oppose the Orwellian “Citizens First” Amendment. Real redistricting reform cannot be achieved by further disenfranchising voters and no one who claims to be a reformer can honestly vote for this. You can find contact information for your state representatives here:
http://is.gd/buawJ

Likely “Citizens First” will come up for a vote in the State House of Representatives next week. Time is of the essence and together we need to stand united against this corrupt and cynical attempt to seize complete control under the guise of “reform”.

Thank you for your support and attention. If you are circulating Put-Back Amendment petitions, please have them postmarked by April 19, 2010.

Sincerely,
John Bambenek
Political Director, Main Street Campaigns
http://facebook.com/JohnBambenek
http://twitter.com/bambenek

By MICHAEL POWELL
Published: July 2, 2010

CHICAGO — Even by the standards of this deficit-ridden state, Illinois’s comptroller, Daniel W. Hynes, faces an ugly balance sheet. Precisely how ugly becomes clear when he beckons you into his office to examine his daily briefing memo.

Payback Time
Articles in this series are examining the consequences of, and efforts to deal with, growing public and private debts.
Previous Articles in the Series »


Multimedia Graphic

Illinois’s Cash Balance and Overdue Payments
He picks the papers off his desk and points to a figure in red: $5.01 billion.

“This is what the state owes right now to schools, rehabilitation centers, child care, the state university — and it’s getting worse every single day,” he says in his downtown office.

Mr. Hynes shakes his head. “This is not some esoteric budget issue; we are not paying bills for absolutely essential services,” he says. “That is obscene.”

For the last few years, California stood more or less unchallenged as a symbol of the fiscal collapse of states during the recession. Now Illinois has shouldered to the fore, as its dysfunctional political class refuses to pay the state’s bills and refuses to take the painful steps — cuts and tax increases — to close a deficit of at least $12 billion, equal to nearly half the state’s budget.

Then there is the spectacularly mismanaged pension system, which is at least 50 percent underfunded and, analysts warn, could push Illinois into insolvency if the economy fails to pick up.

States cannot go bankrupt, technically, but signs of fiscal crackup are easy to see. Legislators left the capital this month without deciding how to pay 26 percent of the state budget. The governor proposes to borrow $3.5 billion to cover a year’s worth of pension payments, a step that would cost about $1 billion in interest. And every major rating agency has downgraded the state; Illinois now pays millions of dollars more to insure its debt than any other state in the nation.
“Their pension is the most underfunded in the nation,” said Karen S. Krop, a senior director at Fitch Ratings. “They have not made significant cuts or raised revenues. There’s no state out there like this. They can’t grow their way out of this.”

As the recession has swept over states and cities, it has laid bare economic weakness and shoddy fiscal practices. Only an infusion of federal stimulus money allowed many states to avert deep layoffs last year.

Cuts in Work Forces
The federal dollars are nearly spent. Last month, local governments nationwide shed more than 20,000 jobs. Should the largest struggling states — like California, New York or Illinois — lay off tens of thousands more in coming months, or default on payments, the reverberations could badly damage a weakened economy and push housing prices down still further.

“You’re not seeing these states bounce back, and that could be a big drag on the national economy,” said Susan K. Urahn of the Pew Center on the States. “It could be a very tough decade.”

In Illinois, the fiscal pain is radiating downward.

From suburban Elgin to Chicago to Rockford to Peoria, school districts have fired thousands of teachers, curtailed kindergarten and electives, drained pools and cut after-school clubs. Drug, family and mental health counseling centers have slashed their work forces and borrowed money to stave off insolvency.

In Beardstown, a small city deep in the western marshes, Ann Johnson plans to shut her century-old pharmacy. Because of late state payments, she could not afford to keep a 10-day supply of drugs. In Chicago, a funeral home owner wonders whether he can afford to bury the impoverished, as the state has fallen six months behind on its charity payments, $1,103 a funeral.

In Peoria — where the city faced a $14.5 million gap this year and could face an additional $10 million budget hole next year — Virginia Holwell, a trainer of child welfare caseworkers, lost her job when the state cut payments to her agency. She sits in her living room high above the Illinois River and calculates the months of savings left before the bank forecloses on her house.

“I’ve got enough to last until the end of August,” she says, matter-of-factly. “I’m 58 and I’m pretty good at what I do, and I got to tell you, I’m pretty devastated.”

Public colleges and universities occupy a fiscal sickbed all their own. This year they muddled through without $668 million expected from the state; the University of Illinois has yet to receive 45 percent of its state appropriation. Legislators made no pretense of promising to pay this bill soon. Instead they authorized colleges to borrow against the expected state payments.

“The big fear is that next year we’ll be down twice as much,” said Randy Kangas, an associate vice president of the university. “No one knows how to make the cash flow work.”

Illinois legislators tend to plead victim to economic circumstance, and the state’s maladies are considerable. In 2006, the Illinois unemployment rate stood below 5 percent; now it is near 11 percent, and the percentage of long-term unemployed exceeds the national average. Major manufacturers have eliminated thousands of jobs, and the state ranks in the top 10 nationally in foreclosures.

Five years ago, the Chicago suburb of Tinley Park issued about 650 home building permits; last year it processed one. The city of Rockford plans to close fire stations and lay off firefighters, and in Decatur, 180 impoverished seniors have lost their delivered meals. The lakeshore condo towers in Chicago bespeak affluence, but there are so many foreclosures on the bungalow blocks of southern and western Chicago that “for sale” signs sprout like sunflowers.

Few budget analysts are surprised to see Illinois, with a limping economy and broken political culture, edge close to the abyss. Two of the last six governors have served jail terms, and a third is on trial.
“We are a fiscal poster child for what not to do,” said Ralph Martire of the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, a liberal-leaning policy group in Illinois. “We make California look as if it’s run by penurious accountants who sit in rooms trying to put together an honest budget all day.”

Stopgap Solutions
The Community Counseling Centers of Chicago is another of those workaday groups that are like the stitches on a baseball, holding together poor and working-class neighborhoods. With an annual budget of $16 million, the agency tends to families torn by crime and violence as well as people who are psychologically stressed and abusing drugs.

On any given Monday morning, the agency’s chief administrative officer, John J. Troy, 61, has no idea how he is going to keep its doors open until Friday. He said the state had not come through with an expected $2.2 million, which is about six months of arrears. He has laid off and recalled employees three times in the last two years.
“Two weeks ago, I had days to meet my $420,000 payroll and all I was looking at was a $200,000 line of credit from a bank,” recalled Mr. Troy. “I drove down to Springfield and said, ‘Hey, you owe us $3 million.’ They said: ‘Oh, that’s nothing. We owe another agency $10 million.’ ”

“The fact of the matter is,” he added, “I don’t sleep much these days.”
Illinois’s fiscal practices are thoroughly fractured. Large agencies survive from one payday to the next. Small agencies seek high-interest loans from out-of-state finance companies.
The state pension system is a money sinkhole and the most immediate threat. The governor and legislature have shortchanged the pensions since the mid-1990s, taking payment “holidays” with alarming regularity.

The state’s last elected governor, Rod R. Blagojevich, is on trial for racketeering and extortion. But in 2003, he persuaded the legislature to let him float $10 billion in 30-year bonds and use the proceeds for two years of pension payments.

That gamble backfired and wound up costing the state many billions of dollars. Illinois reports that it has $62.4 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, although many experts place that liability tens of billions of dollars higher.

Legislators this year raised the retirement age and slashed benefits. Though changes apply only to future employees, the legislature claimed immediate savings.

“Savings upfront and reforms down the road,” said Mr. Hynes, the state comptroller. “It’s just bad habits and bad practices.”
More broadly, Illinois is caught between blue state convictions about social safety nets and a red state aversion to taxes. For years, the Democratic-controlled legislature has passed budgets that are, in effect, in deficit. Lawmakers routinely skip around the state’s balanced-budget law, with few consequences. (Republicans are near monolithic in voting against any tax increases and borrowings. When one broke ranks to try to keep the pension solvent, he was stripped of a committee position, reducing his pay and pension.)

“The pension move was Enron-esque,” said Mike Lawrence, a press secretary to the former Republican governor Jim Edgar, who was the last governor to sign an income tax increase. “Blagojevich was not a tax-and-spend governor; he was a spend-and-borrow governor.”
The state’s income tax burden is not terribly high — Illinois ranks in the bottom half of states — and its government is not terribly large. (The budgets in New York and California, per capita, are much larger). Even if the state cut out all family and human services spending, more than half of the budget deficit would remain.
As comptroller, Mr. Hynes has trained his attention on the public and nonprofit agencies that rely on state money; he tends to roll his eyes at the notion that slashing alone is a solution.
“Only the most delusional people think you can solve this without raising taxes,” he said.
The legislature has a different instinct: to borrow. In good times, that leads to unsightly imbalances. In bad times, it becomes catastrophic. This year, leaders gave the governor authority to move money around and left town to campaign.

“Each budget has gotten historically worse during this recession,” said Laurence Msall, president of the Civic Federation, a policy research organization. “We’ve borrowed more and pushed larger unpaid bills into the future.”

‘Everything Is Triage’
So where is the exit door from this crisis? In Illinois, it depends on whom you ask. The state representative Barbara Flynn Currie, one of the Democratic leaders in the statehouse, sees salvation in the economic cycle. “In the long run, we’ll muddle our way through,” she said.

Perhaps, but many analysts, liberal and conservative, warn of a potentially far grimmer reckoning — Greece by Lake Michigan. Borrowing costs are rising, nonprofits that depend on taxpayer money are dropping contracts, and the state’s pension costs and unpaid bills balloon each month.

Newspaper reports offer stories of hundreds of young teachers moving out of state. Sounding as if she had been punched in the stomach, Ms. Johnson, 53, the pharmacist in Beardstown, said she was going to work at Wal-Mart. Mr. Troy keeps logging on to the comptroller’s Web site to see whether money might soon flow to his counseling centers.
And Ms. Holwell has joined Illinois People’s Action, which challenges banks and foreclosures. With a raspy voice, she talks of her irritation with “the people who just yammer.”

“We’ve helped save four houses,” she said. “Now I wonder: can I save my own?”

For now, Illinois spends a minor fortune papering over its budget holes. Last year, the comptroller’s office paid $55.3 million just in interest on two short-term borrowings to pay the state’s bills.

Mr. Hynes walked into his child’s elementary school recently and learned that kindergarten hours were being cut because of the state budget.

“Everything is triage now,” he said. “We work to avoid outright disaster.”

In past years, when nonprofits needed credit lines to see themselves through tough budget times, the comptroller issued letters assuring banks that vendors would be paid. Not anymore.

“I don’t feel comfortable doing that,” he said, adding with a shrug, “I mean, who knows, right?”

A version of this article appeared in print on July 3, 2010, on page A1 of the New York edition.

For a few hours during the week, Illinois had an $85,000-per-year canoe and kayaking “czar.”

Governor Quinn appointed a long-time campaign and policy advisor, Claude Walker, to the unadvertised and newly-created position to promote canoeing and kayaking in the state. The position, in the state Department of Natural Resources, was created in the midst of one of the most severe budget crisis in Illinois History. Quinn has threatened to cut millions from state schools and plans to balance the state budget by borrowing nearly $5 billion dollars.

Once the media got wind of the story, the Quinn administration abruptly reversed itself, cancelling the position. Walker describes himself on a website devoted to promoting books he’s written, as “a spin-doctor, grassroots organizer, lobbyist, street-heat maestro, campaign spy and candidate.”

Daily Herald takes out after “cowardly vote” on redistricting

The day after the Illinois Senate approved a partisan redistricting scheme, the Daily Herald newspaper blistered lawmakers who had previously committed to the paper that they would instead support non-partisan reforms.

Declaring that “…Democrats backed a plan that still leaves the fox in charge of the henhouse” the Daily Herald warned: “As lawmakers head out to the campaign trail, we hope they won’t try to pretend this is a vote for reform. The people aren’t stupid.”

The editorial pointed out that nearly a year ago, more than 40 state lawmakers of both parties completed a Daily Herald survey in which they pledged to support a non-partisan system of drawing legislative district maps. Instead, six Senate Democrats voted in favor of a partisan redistricting plan that was advanced by Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) over a non-partisan plan developed by the League of Women Voters of Illinois and supported by a broad coalition of reform groups

Hi guys,

Well, I’ve had a little time to settle down after the primary and a thought is hitting me powerfully. First, you should know, I do not plan on working in Illinois the rest of this cycle. As I told all of you before, I don’t think going a third party is a productive use of anyone’s time when we have so much to accomplish. But I also agree with so many of you that Mark Kirk is just a bridge too far. If I worked in Illinois now, I would have to say nice things about him publicly – and after some reflection, I just can’t stomach that. Even so, I am as convinced as ever that a third party is a squandering of effort and a potentially damaging division of time.

Here’s the thing that must happen: as you probably know, some of the establishment and much of Chicago is glorying in the false notion that Bill Brady is too conservative to win in Illinois. Now here are a few facts:

In the last 35 years, only three of the Republican nominees for US Senate have been authentic conservatives. They are Peter Fitzgerald, Al Salvi and Alan Keyes. All the ‘moderates’ have been drubbed badly by Democrats. The only Republican who won was Peter Fitzgerald, a bona fide conservative. Al Salvi was leading in both his own polls and Durbin’s internal polls (I had a source inside his campaign) until the bottom dropped out of the tub with Al’s dreadful Brady blunder a week before election day. Alan Keyes was a train wreck of a candidate in a train wreck of a year. The point is, the only losing Republican who was seriously in the race in the last week was the other bona fide conservative that has been nominated. Yet the establishment still insists that conservatives can’t win in Illinois. The problem is, when the Reagan Revolution swept the country, Illinois had a left-leaning Republican establishment led by Jim Thomson that was not about to move right. The Reagan Revolution passed us by. All the arguments used against conservatives in Illinois are the same arguments that were used against Reagan by the national Republican establishment in 1976 and 1980. This was the same Republican establishment that had given us 40 years in the minority wilderness. Reagan broke through the ‘moderate’ Republican establishment clutter that had kept conservatives on the sidelines for those 40 years – and made the Republican Party into a genuinely competitive party that could govern.

We have a real moment now that can devastate the ‘moderate’ Republican establishment and its arguments about how toxic conservatives are. Leading our ticket are two men who are diametric opposites. As I said before, Bill Brady may not have been your first choice for the gubernatorial nomination. But Brady, Andrjewski and Proft were all authentic conservatives. Also at the top of the ticket is Mark Kirk for US Senate, the most liberal Republican nominee I have ever seen. He is the ‘moderates’ dream candidate. If, in the same cycle, with the same dynamics and climate, Bill Brady substantially outpolls Mark Kirk, it will be a dagger at the very heart of the ‘moderates’ most powerful argument. In 1996 the conventional wisdom was that conservatives could not win Republican Primaries in Illinois. They had not previously because they had been so fractured and combative. The best a conservative had done in a statewide primary before Salvi was to garner 28% of the vote – and that in a two-way race. That cycle blew away the prevailing conventional wisdom forever after.

You have the same opportunity here. You can prove that the main reasons conservatives have rarely won in Illinois heretofore is not because of Democrats – but because the prevailing Republican establishment has done its best to prevent conservatives from rising and has sabotaged them when they did. Do you think the establishment is going to push Brady over the top? Heavens no. He’s a conservative – and if he wins big it will likely topple much of the moderate power structure. If you divide your efforts, some going off for a third party and some going in other directions and Brady loses or makes a lackluster showing, we have the same arguments we have had ad nauseum for a decade and a half. If all of you unite behind Bill Brady, making him your prime candidate and the source of all your energy you can, in a single blow, sound the death knell of moderate Republican pre-eminence in Illinois – and finally bring the Reagan Revolution to Reagan’s native state. I know it is 30 years late but, hey, we are obviously slow learners in Illinois. In the process, you can also insure that Illinois gets put on a track leading to sound government by sound conservative principles into the future. You will prove that the reason conservatives had such a hard time winning in Illinois is because the Republican establishment worked so hard to shut them out and starve them of money, not because the electorate wouldn’t vote for them. And to do this, you don’t have to say anything nice about Mark Kirk – you just are obligated to keep silent about him. You certainly don’t have to vote for him. I lived in his Congressional District one cycle. I would not carry his literature, I did not vote for him in the primary and I did not vote for him in the general election. I can swallow a lot on behalf of unity to beat the much worse Democrats, but I have no intention of going to confession and telling the priest I voted for a man who supports the hideous practice of partial birth abortion. I understand.

Now, lest any of you are cynics who think I have signed some contract with Brady, as I said, I will not work in Illinois the rest of this cycle. With the things I do, I would have to speak in support of Kirk at times. I simply can’t. I can be silent about him but I can’t speak publicly in support of him. On the other hand, do not hold it against those genuine conservatives on the ticket or playing a high-profile role who must do so. They are advocating for us – and in order to reach a position where they can do us the most good and transform this state, they must make the sacrifice on behalf of party unity or they have no chance of moving the chains for us.

As for me, I am working the next three weeks to finish a writing project I should have finished last summer – and after that I will be working a campaign in another state, most likely Alabama – the most conservative state in the country. But I will be closely following Illinois. It says in the Bible that one sows and another reaps. As one who has, with great frustration, spent many years sowing in this inhospitable soil, I will rejoice to see you reap. But you must be focused and unified. You have the advantage now of having a multitude of dynamic conservative leaders who are clearly the future of our party: Bill Brady, Patrick Hughes, Adam Andrjewski, Dan Proft and Jason Plummer. Stand with them and unify to make this gubernatorial race the defining moment for Illinois conservatives for the next generation.

Charlie Johnston
(618) 406-5874

Feb. 07, 2010

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=37014&ba=1

(AP) — The Democratic nominee for Illinois lieutenant governor has dropped out of the race less than a week after winning the nomination amid a political uproar about his past.
Scott Lee Cohen announced his decision Sunday night at a Chicago bar.

The pawn broker and owner of a cleaning supplies company won the nomination Tuesday. Since then, it has become widely know that he was accused of abusing his ex-wife and holding a knife to the throat of an ex-girlfriend.

The girlfriend herself had been charged with prostitution. He also admits using steroids in the past.

Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, who would have been paired with Cohen on the November ticket, U.S. Rep. Danny Davis and Sen. Dick Durbin all had urged Cohen to leave the race.

Powered by WordPress Web Design by SRS Solutions © 2010 Homer/Lockport Tea Party Design by SRS Solutions